Animal testing good or bad

No experiment, no matter how painful or trivial, is prohibited—and painkillers are not even required. Many people are now donating their bodies to science when they die - to experiment on them. The answer of course is YES! Because animal tests are so unreliable, they make those human trials all the more risky.


Animal models can provide a great tool to learn about certain diseases, especially in regards to how they progresses in time and how they can be diagnosed. Discoveries in Pharmacology, ed.

Furthermore, according to the World Health Organization, cancer is largely preventable, yet most health organizations that focus on cancer spend a pittance on prevention programs, such as public education.

Physiological reactions to drugs vary enormously from species to species and even within a species. Unfortunately, we are still not at the stage where animal research is obsolete. The argument also ignores the reasoning ability of many animals, including pigs who demonstrate measurably sophisticated approaches to solving problems and primates who not only use tools but also teach their offspring how to use them.

At the same time, more and more pro-testing groups that support the humane use of animals in research have been forming — these proponents argue and recognize the essential role that animal research has played in medical advancements and breakthroughs throughout the years.

Recently, there appears to be an overwhelming growth in animal right groups all over the world. Between andnearly half a million animals—excluding mice, rats, birds, and cold-blooded animals—were subjected to painful experiments and not provided with pain relief.

Animal testing good or bad?

However, the return on that investment has been dismal. Would anyone be willing to go through unnecessary and extremely risky procedures to donate brain cells to science?

This fact is especially apparent when one considers the specialized needs of each species. Immortalized cell lines that are preserved for many years and used over and over are not always representative of the physiological functions of cells that are in their normal environment, the body.

So the tests are not "cruel". Animal testing is one of the many things that people hate. However, by choosing the appropriate model you can get a relatively good representation and therefore more accurate and relevant results.

This does not necessarily mean that we have never learned anything or provided safe and successful treatments based on animal research. What animal activists fail to understand, in my opinion, is that we researchers appreciate the past and present contribution of animals to improving human health, helping cure diseases and saving lives.

An article published in the esteemed Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine has even evaluated this very claim and concluded that it was not supported by any evidence.

This is not only cruel but also unethical. Research is always evolving, improving and progressing.Animal testing is cannot be taken to save other researcher has the right to take an animal life if he cannot give it is not justified just by saying that it is for human progress and mi-centre.comg to give though it.

ANIMAL RESEARCH: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE ALTERNATIVES by Katerina Othonos. Animal research is a very controversial topic that has been generating heated arguments and debates all around the world over the past few decades.

Animal Testing is Good and Bad.

Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint

It is bad because, the animals die and it is disgusting. And it is good because, you don't have to be experimented on, the animal do.

Yes animal testing is good and. Dangerous animal testing Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused aroundheart attacks and strokes anddeaths worldwide.

Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.

Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint Studies published in prestigious medical journals have shown time and again that animal experimentation wastes lives—both animal and human—and precious resources by trying to infect animals with diseases that they would never normally contract.

Animal testing good or bad
Rated 5/5 based on 13 review