An analysis of the potential dangers in using nuclear power plants as an energy source

The process of creating a nuclear reaction is very precise. What is Nuclear Energy? While being environmentally friendly is the big plus of nuclear energy, disposal of radioactive waste and protecting people and environment from its radiations is a big cons of nuclear energy. Over a dozen commercial reactors have been shut down permanently, with more retirements likely to be announced in coming years.

Diverse and multiple safety systems at each plant provide the necessary cooling water.

The Future of Nuclear Power

The byproducts from burning fossil fuels are toxic pollutants that produce ozone, toxic organic aerosols, particulate matter, and heavy metals. Before the mids, the plan for spent uranium was to reprocess it into new fuel. Appropriate procedures for including PRA in the process for changing regulatory requirements should be developed and followed.

That job would be done with H-bombs having a total power of 42 megatons. Why is radioactive material dangerous? The extent to which nuclear power remains a major U. Many plants contain more than one reactor. Only Finland has stable repository plans, therefore from a worldwide perspective, long-term waste storage costs are uncertain.

The amount of greenhouse gases emitted from each energy source is shown above. Nuclear generation does not directly produce sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury or other pollutants associated with the combustion of fossil fuels. Most uranium concentrate is made by leaching the uranium from the ore with acids.

Makhijani has a Ph. It can also cause damage to living things in and around the plants. Some foreign reactor designs use coolants other than water to carry the heat of fission away from the core. Actually transporting nuclear fuel to and from plants represents a pollution hazard.

One of the biggest issues is environmental impact in relation to uranium. The radioactivity in these wastes can range from just above natural background levels, like in uranium mill tailings, to much higher levels, like in used spent reactor fuel or in the parts inside a nuclear reactor.

Despite the dangers, a properly running nuclear power plant can be safer and less toxic than many other types of power plants. The future of nuclear power American reactors were initially licensed to operate for up to 40 years.

Smith holds a Ph. Wyoming and the Four Corners region produce most U. In this case, they did.

Reconsidering the Risks of Nuclear Power

Nuclear power debate The abandoned city of Prypiat, Ukrainefollowing the Chernobyl disaster. In a nuclear reaction, the nucleus of the atom breaks into several pieces and releases an immense amount of energy.

The book also details economically competitive alternative fuel sources which can address U. In the core of nuclear reactors, the fission of uranium atoms releases energy that heats water to about degrees Farenheit.The extent to which nuclear power remains a major U.S.

energy source depends on many variables, including its role in fighting climate change, nuclear safety, cost, and the growth of other energy sources. But can nuclear power handle the load?

A Trash Heap Deadly forYears or a Renewable Energy Source? Nuclear waste is either a millennia's worth of lethal garbage or the fuel of future. A nuclear power plant or nuclear power station is a thermal power station in which the heat source is a nuclear and multibillion-dollar investments ride on the choice of an energy source.

Nuclear power stations typically have high capital costs, Nuclear power plants are routinely used in load following mode on a large scale in France.

When balanced with these notable benefits, the problems associated with nuclear power do not justify its immediate dismissal as a potential energy source for the world.

Jordan Wilkerson is a PhD candidate in the Department of Chemistry at Harvard University. Insurmountable Risks: The Dangers of Using Nuclear Power to Combat Global Climate Change, produced by the non-profit Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IEER), documents accident, proliferation and contamination threats associated with reviving the nuclear industry as part of efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

But all of that work will be wasted if we transition from fossil fuels to an equally dangerous source – nuclear power. Nuclear power is not a climate solution. It may produce lower-carbon energy, but this energy comes with a great deal of risk. National security Nuclear power plants are a potential target for terrorist operations.

Nuclear power debate


An analysis of the potential dangers in using nuclear power plants as an energy source
Rated 4/5 based on 20 review